New report out on massage and neck pain. The results are……….actually, I’m not really that interested in the results.
What is interesting is the diagnosis. So, what august verbiage do they use to classify neck pain? (drum roll) The answer is…….mechanical neck pain. That means that your pain is not caused by a tumor or infection or something else that we are comfortable with – treating, they don’t really want you to have those terrible things, but then their job is more straightforward at least.
Sometimes they will call it “non-specific” neck or back pain. That is really the more honest answer, but they are interchangeable.
So, you say, “Doctor, my neck hurts. What is wrong with me?” He takes a look, can’t find much and says, “Well, it looks like your neck hurts.” That is what they are doing in these studies.
This is why treatment for neck and back pain is such a mess. If you don’t have a specific diagnosis, you can’t expect a cure. What do you think would happen if they studied the effect on “car trouble” of changing the battery. Sometimes it would help and sometimes not.
Let’s imagine that we diagnosed chest pain that way. Let’s say were doing a study on the treatment of chest pain.
Hypothetical Chest Pain Study
If you click on the hypothetical chest pain study you will see that if we group these people together and just treat “chest pain”, just less than half will get better with antacids and the same percentage will respond to nitroglycerin. (Costochondritis is a cause of pain in the chest which will go away on its own in time.)
While this hypothetical study is not perfect, it does illustrate the problems of treating without a diagnosis. It ends up looking like nothing works much better than anything else. And not getting treatment does not look that much worse than getting treated.
Good research and good treatment both need to start from a good diagnosis! Fortunately, we do have some answers here, but this information is not disseminated well. We’ll get to that another day.